Human beings are context
aware – by nature
We all know [1] that human beings assign meaning to
information based on its ever accompanying context. Information, so to speak,
never travels on its own; it always shows up together with a certain context.
And it’s that very context that inescapably helps to ‘shape’ information into
its situational meaning.
We all know [1] that human behavior springs forth from
personally assigned meaning to individually sensed information – information being
sensed and processed over time.
In day to day life human beings aren’t consciously aware of
their (generally speaking) fine grained context awareness capabilities. Most of
the time they ‘simply’ sense, interpret and act. Actions which, in turn, result
in new signs/information that also can be sensed. Etc. etc.
Modern information
systems should all be context aware – but they are not
So… to human beings the meaning of information is not at all
fixed, but always depends on its accompanying context – represented, of course,
by contextual information [2].
All of our contemporary systems, however, still work with
information of fixed and predefined meaning. This meaning of information
usually is determined during design. As a consequence the resulting information
system is highly inflexible with respect to changes in meaning – changes that inevitably
will occur over time. Situations change…. Our interests change…. We all know
that.
Because of ever increasing dynamics – in our modern businesses
as well as in our information society/network society – fewer and fewer things
remain the same for very long anymore. We all know that.
Context aware
systems require contextually modeled information
In order to solve this wicked problem [3], we need context
aware systems. We need information systems that can handle change-of-meaning of
information because of change-in-context. Why? Because we need to be able to quickly
and optimally support human beings in the way they are naturally ‘wired’:
sensing, interpreting, acting, sensing, ….
We all know that information systems are all about…
information [4]. It is for that reason that context aware systems are most
naturally built around contextually modeled information [5]. Contextually
modeled information is suitable to be processed by context aware systems in
order to be situationally applicable by human beings.
Needed: contextual
information modeling
Contextual information modeling, also called systematic
information modeling [6], qualitatively differs from traditional information
modeling. Contextual information modeling requires systems thinking.
Traditional information modeling [7] needs a specific problem
for which a specific information model annex software is created that specifically
matches that specific problem in a specific way. Also read: the system is
designed to work for one specific context – solving precisely (and only) that
specific problem.
In case of systematic information modeling [7] – from the
perspective of the designer – there is no specific problem to create a model
for. The resulting model will be systematic in nature and will therefore cover
a wide range of problems – one of them, of course, being the specific problem
at hand.
Compared with a traditional information model a systematic
information model shows quite a bit of an upside down experience to the
traditional modeler/designer. Elements that appear to be of key interest in
traditional models, show up at quite other positions in systematic ones.
Yielding context
aware solutions
As said: the resulting systematic [8] information model is fit to match
a wide range of problems – including the specific problem at hand. Because of
its systematic nature, i.e. the systematic organization of information in the
model, the software aligns around it in a contextual fashion – yielding a
context aware information system [5].
Supporting context
aware people
Context aware systems provide true support to contextually
operating human beings that need to quickly, confidently and accurately find
their ways in the ever increasing dynamics of our modern businesses/society [9].
Copyright (c) 2013 Emovere/Jan van Til - All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2013 Emovere/Jan van Til - All rights reserved.
Alle publicaties op deze site zijn gebaseerd op mijn eigen opvattingen. Ze vertegenwoordigen niet noodzakelijkerwijs de standpunten en het beleid van mijn werkgever(s).
[Notes]
1. We all know that from social psychology (wiki).
2. Indeed, meaning is situational, always and 100% of the time: Situational Meaning. In case you need some extra theoretical background, please read Semiotic Ennead.
3. It’s a wicked problem because we, human beings, ‘naturally’ look for far too long for faster horses; we seem to hate to thoroughly solve our problems.
4. Explained in more detail in The Core of Information Oriented Architecture.
5. For more details, please view infOrmation Orchestration (on slideshare).
6. A profound method for systematic information modeling is Metapattern – a surprisingly elegant as well as powerful method. As a method metapattern comes with a strong philosophy: Subjective Situationism. Metapattern is supported with a tool-set/operational platform, called Knitbits.
7. For more details, please study Systematic Organization of Information.
8. Systematic means: across domains and across organisations/societies.
9. For more details, please view Human Interoperability (on slideshare – via information roundabout).
1. We all know that from social psychology (wiki).
2. Indeed, meaning is situational, always and 100% of the time: Situational Meaning. In case you need some extra theoretical background, please read Semiotic Ennead.
3. It’s a wicked problem because we, human beings, ‘naturally’ look for far too long for faster horses; we seem to hate to thoroughly solve our problems.
4. Explained in more detail in The Core of Information Oriented Architecture.
5. For more details, please view infOrmation Orchestration (on slideshare).
6. A profound method for systematic information modeling is Metapattern – a surprisingly elegant as well as powerful method. As a method metapattern comes with a strong philosophy: Subjective Situationism. Metapattern is supported with a tool-set/operational platform, called Knitbits.
7. For more details, please study Systematic Organization of Information.
8. Systematic means: across domains and across organisations/societies.
9. For more details, please view Human Interoperability (on slideshare – via information roundabout).
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten